It just keeps getting more and more interesting. Almost every day more news about proposition 8 hits the media outlets here in LA. I'm sort of over it. But lately, it's getting more interesting because it involves even larger issues than civil rights for minorities. Now, the entire election process is under siege!
Apparently a lawsuit has been filed by the supporters of Proposition 8 to order the Secretary of State's office to remove all donor information from their website, which it is required by California law to publish to meet campaign disclosure requirements. This has huge implications. I am a strong proponent of transparency in the workings of government, especially the election process, which the current campaign laws are designed to protect. Suddenly, extreme conservatives want to do away with campaign disclosure requirements? Why? What do they have to hide?
I certainly hope that people are not being physically threatened or physically intimidated in any way, on either side of this issue. That's just wrong. People are entitled to their opinions. I suspect that the reason for the lawsuit is more directly related to matters of commerce. Numerous businesses who have provided funding to support Proposition 8, even when many of their employees opposed it and had no idea of their employers financial support, have been boycott by those who opposed the ballot initiative. When 48% of the state population might boycott something, that can have serious business implications. In these difficult economic times, some businesses are apparently going bankrupt because of this while others are losing talented employees over it. Immediately after the election many were very boastful in the local media of their support of the proposition. Now, the tide seems to have turned dramatically. They don't want anyone to know.
And today the media reports that the California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC), I didn't even know we have such a thing, is investigating the Mormon Church for allegations that it made vast non-monetary donations to the campaign that were not reported. Again, if true, this is a violation of campaign finance laws. As I've blogged before, I believe strongly that when any organization functions as a political action group (PAC), regardless of whether that organization supports or opposes any political position or candidate, that organization, in compliance with federal law, should not be tax exempt. And, I have always strongly believed that the separation of church and state must be maintained in our country, a position that has been assailed at every opportunity, to the long term detriment of this nation in my opinion, by this soon-to-end presidential administration.
And, for everyone who just can't get enough of a really bad thing, the lead council in the suit against the state to void all existing same sex marriages is, of all people, Kenneth Starr. Remember him? He was the Republican party's bulldog that, in my opinion, wasted millions and millions of tax payer dollars in the media spotlight trying to unearth some tidbit of financial scandal, that his very investigation actually proved never existed, against the Clintons. Instead, he gave the bloodlust machinery a sex scandal. Can't he just go away?! I had no idea he is a law professor at Pepperdine University in Malibu.
And one final interesting tidbit. This has probably been around forever and I'm the last to find out, but someone created a Google Maps mashup of the donors who supported Proposition 8. If one exists for those who opposed it, I am unaware of it. You can zoom in down to the street! Now that's transparency in campaign contribution disclosure! [Interestingly, earlier in that same newspaper, I learned of a Google Maps mashup showing the location of arrests because of gang-related criminal activity. Mental note: areas to avoid! The times in which we live...]
Recent Comments